Defendant was not entitled to a new trial and the appointment of an expert to analyze a supplemental gunshot residue pattern and proximity test conducted by an independent forensic laboratory. The court denied defendant's post-trial motion for relief.
September 29, 2017 at 01:50 PM
1 minute read
Post Conviction Relief Act • Newly Discovered Evidence • Amended Expert Report
Commonwealth v. Dominick, PICS Case No. 17-1380 (C.P. Lackawanna Sept. 6, 2017) New, J. (14 pages).
Defendant was not entitled to a new trial and the appointment of an expert to analyze a supplemental gunshot residue pattern and proximity test conducted by an independent forensic laboratory. The court denied defendant’s post-trial motion for relief.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
