PERSONAL INJURY
Business Invitee • Negligence • Duty to Protect • Duty to Aid
Trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of store in appellant's action based on fight she had with a third party in the store because appellant was a business invitee, there was no evidence of any past violence or issues with or by the third party in the store and store satisfied its duty to aid by calling the police. Affirmed.
September 12, 2017 at 10:56 AM
1 minute read
PERSONAL INJURY
Business Invitee • Negligence • Duty to Protect • Duty to Aid
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS