Policy Terms • Primary Coverage • Excess Insurance Endorsement
Seagrave Fire Apparatus, LLC v. CNA d/b/a Continental Casualty Co. et al, PICS Case No. 17-1147 (C.P. Philadelphia June 28, 2017) Djerassi, J. (8 pages).
The defendant insurer was obligated to provide a defense to plaintiff, a manufacturer of fire engines facing hundreds of firefighter claims of occupational noise-induced hearing loss, where the coverage provided was primary under the general provisions of the applicable policies rather than excess, as the insurer maintained. The court denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
