Construction Contract • Change Request Documents • Business Documents • Authenticity
Sycamore Restaurant Group, LLC v. Stampfi Hartke Assoc., LLC, PICS Case No. 17-1198 (Pa. Super. July 12, 2017) Lazarus, J. (15 pages).
Trial court properly found architectural firm liable only for rent and construction loan interest in action by restaurant asserting breach of an architectural and engineering services contract because trial court properly excluded change request documents since those documents were not modifications to the contract and were not proper evidence of rock removal and dewatering costs as they were created by a third party and there was no evidence to corroborate the authenticity of the documents. Affirmed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
