Office of Open Records • Right-to-Know Law • Enforcement • Writ of Mandamus
Capinski v. Upper Pottsgrove Township, PICS Case No. 17-0999 (Pa. Commw. June 14, 2017) Leavitt, J.; Brobson, J., concurring (21 pages).
Plaintiff properly sought to enforce a final determination of the Office of Open Records through a writ of mandamus, rather than a petition to enforce, where he did not appeal the final determination to a court for a merits review. The court affirmed the trial court’s decision denying plaintiff relief on the merits.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
