Patent Litigation • Antitrust Litigation • Admissibility • Prejudice • ‘Actavis’ Rule of Reason
Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc., PICS Case No. 17-0987 (E.D. Pa. June 8, 2107) Goldberg, J. (20 pages).
The court found that findings of patent invalidity and noninfringement made after reverse-payment settlement agreements were irrelevant to the rule of reason analysis in plaintiff's antitrust litigation but were relevant to plaintiff's antitrust causation showing and were admissible and the court ordered a two phase trial to limit prejudice and jury confusion. Two phase trial ordered.
June 30, 2017 at 01:37 PM
1 minute read
Patent Litigation • Antitrust Litigation • Admissibility • Prejudice • ‘Actavis’ Rule of Reason
Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc., PICS Case No. 17-0987 (E.D. Pa. June 8, 2107) Goldberg, J. (20 pages).
Phila. Jury Hands Up $6.1M Verdict to Crushed Worker Despite Plaintiff's 'Nuclear' Settlement Demand
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS