Retirement Code • “In Office or Employment” • Police Officer • Murder • Collateral Estoppel

Tepper v. Phila. Bd. of Pensions and Retirement, PICs Case No. 17-0962 (Pa. Commw. June 2, 2017) Cohn Jubelirer, J. (17 pages).

Trial court properly affirmed the board’s decision that collateral estoppel prevented officer from relitigating whether he was acting “in office or employment” when he murdered his neighbor after a personal argument while off-duty because a federal jury hearing the victim’s family’s civil rights complaint determined that officer was a state actor and collateral estoppel applied. Affirmed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]