The trial court erred in failing to consider evidence related to the potential sale of the parties' successful trucking business before assigning the entire asset to husband as part of the equitable distribution of the parties' marital estate. The appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings.
June 23, 2017 at 12:28 AM
1 minute read
Equitable Distribution • Marital Asset • Tax Implications of Asset Sale
Carney v. Carney, PICS Case No. 17-0944 (Pa. Super. May 31, 2017) Stevens, J. (16 pages).
The trial court erred in failing to consider evidence related to the potential sale of the parties’ successful trucking business before assigning the entire asset to husband as part of the equitable distribution of the parties’ marital estate. The appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings.
'Old School' Expectations Plague Young Lawyer Mental Health—But Not All Predecessors Are Sympathetic
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
