Admissibility • Attorney-Client Privilege • Email Correspondence
Township of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractor, Inc. et al, PICS Case No. 17-0837 (C.P. Lawrence May 18, 2017) Hodge, J. (39 pages).
Neither the attorney-client privilege nor the work-product privilege applied to many of the emails which plaintiff sought to exclude from evidence at trial where such emails were not drafted by an attorney or party representative and the emails did not relate to a fact of which an attorney was informed by his client for purposes of securing a legal opinion or services. The court recommended affirmance of decision on appeal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
