Divorce • Equitable Distribution • Indispensable Party
Fagnilli v. Fagnilli, PICS Case No. 17-0832 (C.P. Lawrence Feb. 14, 2017) Hodge, J. (20 pages).
Pursuant to the law of the case doctrine, the court refused to disturb its finding that the parties’ adult daughter, who was unjustly enriched by a mortgage fraudulently obtained by wife on the parties’ marital property, was an indispensable party to this divorce proceeding. The court denied wife’s exceptions in part.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
