Filter This View

  • Vanderbol v. Vanderbol

    Publication Date: 2024-05-13
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Birdwell
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 02-23-00230

    The parties married in 2011 and had one child. In 2015, the parties separated and in 2023 their divorce was finalized. Following a bench trial, the trial court ordered appellant to pay $1,840 monthly in child support and $100 in cash medical support.

  • Shumskie v. Finnell

    Publication Date: 2024-05-13
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law | Insurance Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Williams
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-22-00130-CV

    Appellant, the former wife of decedent, sued appellee Finnell, the surviving widow, to recover the proceeds of decedent's life insurance policy with American General Life Insurance Co

  • Pugh v. Winfield-Pugh

    Publication Date: 2024-05-06
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Jewell
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-23-00501-CV

    Appellant appealed from a final decree of divorce in favor of his wife. Appellant was served with the divorce petition while he was in jail.

  • Pilcher v. Maddox

    Publication Date: 2024-05-06
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Landau
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-22-00597-CV

    Appellant Pilcher challenged a default family-violence protective order issued against him because the record failed to establish strict compliance with statutory notice requirements.

  • Graves v. Graves

    Publication Date: 2024-04-29
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Poissant
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-22-00762-CV

    A former husband, who appealed the trial court's final divorce decree from his former wife, failed to prove on appeal that he was entitled to relief.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In the Interest of A.R.D.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-29
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Zimmerer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-24-00010-CV

    Mother appealed the trial court's final order terminating her parental rights and appointing the Department of Family and Protective Services as sole managing conservator of her child, A.R.D. The trial court terminated mother's parental rights on predicate grounds of endangerment, constructive abandonment, and failure to comply with a family service plan.

  • In the Interest of Z.A.R.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-22
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Reichek
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-23-01142-CV

    Mother challenged the trial court's order terminating her parental rights because neither she nor her counsel were present at the time of the non-jury trial.

  • In the Interest of J.C. & J.C.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-22
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Wallach
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 02-23-00381-CV

    Father petitioned to terminate mother's parental rights to the parties' two minor children and asked to be named the sole conservator.

  • Muth v. Voe

    Publication Date: 2024-04-22
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Rights | Family Law | Health Care Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Triana
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-22-00420-CV

    In February 2022, the attorney general issued an opinion concluding that dispensing certain drugs to children with gender dysphoria could constitute child abuse as defined by the Texas Family Code and appellants, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and its commissioner, took certain actions in response.

  • Landry v. Landry

    Publication Date: 2024-04-15
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 22-0565

    In a divorce proceeding, the trial court ruled that certain investment accounts were petitioner's separate property.