Filter This View

  • Robert Lee Menefee v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1568-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the co

  • Anthony Ray Willis v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1380-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), 68.5 & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of

  • Curtis Charles Brown v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0903/0904-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) , because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appea

  • Tora Lakeith Russell, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-09-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0211-12

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates R Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See R

  • Eric Paul Bradix v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0884-10,, PD-0885-10,, PD-0886-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) and 68.4(i), because the petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and it

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Georgia Construction Law Handbook 2024

    Authors: T. BART GARY, JAKE CARROLL

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • James Ray Barrow v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0756-10

    OPINIONAppellant was convicted of robbery and was sentenced to confinement for ten years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Barrow v. State, No. 07-08-00298-CR (Tex. App. --- Amarillo,

  • Todd Warren Altschul v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-11
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1443-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe ion for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) because the original ion is not accompanied by 11 copies.The

  • Ex Parte Ronnie Joe Neal

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-70,512-01

    ORDERIn May 2006, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder, and the trial court set his punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct app

  • Michael Johnson v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-11
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1778-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates R Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See R

  • Richard Cisneros, Jr v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-11-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-10-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD 0927-09

    Meyers, j. dissented.We have determined that our decision to grant the appellant's petition was improvident. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.P