Filter This View

  • Leon Charles Johnson v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-11
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1620-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the

  • Ex Parte Monroe Webb, Applicant

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-37,223-02

    ORDERThis is an application for a writ of habeas corpus that was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07, Section 3, of the Texas Code

  • Yedidiyah Hawkins v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1189-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See Rule o

  • Ex Parte Mickey Ray Minter,

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-72,801-01

    ORDERPursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

  • Darrin Dewin Houston v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1601-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of Pennsylvania Family Law Forms, Fourth Edition

    Authors: Joseph S. Britton

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Natasha Rashenet Johnson v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-11
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0877-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of a

  • Ray Redding, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0988-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS TARRANT COUNTYKeasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of A

  • Mark Carl Warren, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1457-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) because it does not contain a complete copy of the opinion of the court

  • Paul Harold Rice v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-08
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0954-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court

  • Jeffery Charles Stinson v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-04-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-18
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0242-12, PD-0243-12

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of