The relator seeks habeas corpus relief from a civil contempt order and seeks a writ of prohibition preventing the trial court from holding criminal contempt proceedings. The order's purging condition does not clearly or specifically notify relator of the action he needs to take to purge himself of contempt and escape the restraint on his liberty. The provision fails to specify the type of document relator is required to execute and record in order to vacate the substitute trustee's deed and leaves open for interpretation the form of the required document, given that the only guideline is that it must be in a "form acceptable to the [trial court]." The contempt order is void, the writ of habeas corpus is granted. The writ of prohibition is denied because the relator failed to demonstrate how the alleged criminal contempt proceedings involving relator are a threat to the subject matter of an appeal currently pending in the court of appeals. Houston's 1st Court of Appeals, No. 01-13-01001-CV, No. 01-13-01094-CV, 06-12-2014
|June 12, 2014
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
This premium content is locked for Texas Lawyer subscribers only.
Subscribe now to enjoy unlimited access to Texas Lawyer content,
5 free articles* across the ALM Network every 30 days,
Exclusive access to other free ALM publications
And exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications.
*May exclude premium content Already have an account? Sign In Now
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to email@example.com to learn more.
As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters.
Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss.
Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.