The road through Texas appellate courts is littered with plaintiffs’ health-care liability claims and verdicts that have been reversed because of Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 74, which contains most of the state’s most stringent tort-reform policies.
That’s why the Texas Supreme Court’s Nov. 30 decision in Aaron Felton v. Brock Lovett is remarkable: It reverses an intermediate appellate court decision that itself reversed and rendered a $742,701 jury verdict against a chiropractor for failure to warn about a procedure’s risk.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
