Lawyers who have even a hint that there could be a relationship between an arbitrator and opposing counsel should object loudly and long before a decision is reached; otherwise, their client may be out of luck.
That’s the takeaway from the 5th Court of Appeals’ opinion in Ponderosa Pine Energy v. Tenaska Energy Inc., et al., in which the Dallas justices reversed and rendered a trial court’s decision to vacate a $125 million arbitration award.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
