Over the past 20 years, nothing appears to have changed the face of family law in Texas as much as the use of alternative dispute resolution procedures. In most of the larger counties across the state, courts will not hear a contested final trial unless the parties first have attempted mediation. Some courts require mediation before allowing a contested temporary orders hearing. ADR procedures including mediation, arbitration and collaborative law seem to have significantly reduced the congested family court dockets.
But the Texas Supreme Court is considering a case that could undermine the effectiveness of these ADR procedures. In Re Stephanie Lee is a case in which the trial court declined to enter judgment on a validly executed mediated settlement agreement (MSA), notes Houston’s 14th Court of Appeals in its opinion in the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
