Civil Litigation Is Up in DFW Region, With Some Practices Booming More Than Others
Dallas County courts saw a 25% increase in civil litigation from 2015 to 2019, while Tarrant County courts saw a 28% gain. Some civil practice areas are enjoying larger upticks than others.
March 10, 2020 at 06:24 PM
5 minute read
Civil litigation has grown at a healthy rate in the Dallas-Fort Worth district courts in the past five years.
Dallas County district courts saw a 25% increase in civil litigation from 2015 to 2019, while Tarrant County district courts saw a 28% gain, according to statistics from the Texas Office of Court Administration.
Civil district judges are seeing the rise, according to 14th District Judge Eric Moyé, who serves as the local civil administrative judge in Dallas County. He said he's unsure of the reason but feels that population growth can't fully explain it.
"There's been an increase in the number of cases in virtually all of the courts," Moyé said. "I have confidence that my colleagues and I are able to manage the increasing numbers in our docket."
Some civil practice areas are enjoying larger upticks than others. In Dallas County, the booming areas are consumer debt, civil cases relating to criminal cases, and motor vehicle. In Tarrant County, large growth came to civil cases relating to criminal cases, contract, real property and motor vehicle practice areas. In both counties, the practice area that's declined the most over the five-year period is tax cases.
|Booming Practice: Consumer Debt
Consumer debt is the civil practice area growing the most in Dallas County district courts. The number of debt cases increased by 90% over five years, from 4,146 to 7,887 cases. In Tarrant County district court, the number of debt cases grew by 27% in the five-year period, from 2,007 to 2,550.
The increasing debt caseload traces a statewide trend. The most recent Annual Statistical Report for the Texas Judiciary said that in the past five years, debt cases across the state have risen by 88% in district courts and county courts at law.
"It is a national trend being reported similarly by other states," wrote David Slayton, administrative director of the Texas Office of Court Administration, in an email.
Moyé, the Dallas County district judge, said he has noticed that the amount of money that creditors sue over has been decreasing.
"I'm astounded by the numbers of suits, and I see them typically get default judgments. Two months after the filing of the suit, they will take a default judgment for $2,000, or $1,500," Moyé said.
The increase in debt cases traces back to the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created in 2011 after the Great Recession, which changed the landscape for consumer debt cases, said Mike Weston, owner of Weston Legal in Houston.
"They started suing the banks that were selling the debt, for massive amounts. They were suing the big debt collectors," explained Weston, who represents debtors in the Dallas-Fort Worth region and across Texas.
That prompted disruption from 2013 to 2016 among Texas debt collection law firms. Smaller law firms and solo practices stopped representing banks and creditors.
"It really consolidated into the bigger law firms, they consolidated, because they had to invest hundreds of thousands of dollars into compliance, to be allowed to represent the banks, so the banks don't get sued for collecting bad debt," he said.
Today, banks and their outside counsel are in compliance with federal regulation about debt collection, and it makes the creditors more comfortable filing larger numbers of debt lawsuits, Weston said.
This has created opportunity for attorneys who represent the debtors, such as Weston, but he noted that the cases now are harder to defend because the creditors have better documentation to prove up the debt.
Also, since many debtors do not have a lot of money to pay an attorney, lawyers like Weston must charge affordable fees. He noted that his firm offers a flat fee, and puts clients on 10-month payment plans. To make it a viable practice, an attorney must have a very high-volume practice, and hire many support staff to manage all those cases.
"There are competitors," Weston noted. "Most of us in this area have been doing it a really long time."
|Other Court Trends
There were lesser increases in Dallas County district courts in other practice areas, including motor vehicle, contract, and medical malpractice. Place your cursor over the graphic below to view the numbers.
Interactive graphic:
Source: Texas Office of Court Administration. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM
Over the five years in Tarrant County, multiple district court practice areas saw significant growth. Contract cases ticked up by 49%, from 303 to 452. Real property cases grew by 34%, while motor vehicle cases grew by 28% and debt cases climbed by 27%. Place your cursor on the graphic below to view the numbers.
Interactive graphic:
Source: Texas Office of Court Administration. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher Partner Moves to Vinson & Elkins as Co-Head of Strategic M&A
3 minute readLatham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250