This story is reprinted with permission from FC&S Legal, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
The Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, sitting en banc, has denied a motion for en banc reconsideration. Notably, three of the seven justices would have granted the motion, and the three justices would have ruled that an automobile insurance policy covered exemplary damages – including punitive damages. Given that Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion of the Fourth District felt compelled to write a separate opinion concurring in the denial of the motion for en banc consideration, perhaps this issue has not yet been firmly settled in Texas.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
