The Cato Institute has cited a recent Kroll Inc. investigation into the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions practices as uncovering evidence that shows the school’s arguments against longtime plaintiff Abigail Fisher are “a sham.”
The Cato Institute made that argument in its recently filed friend of the court brief, supporting Fisher’s petition to have her discrimination allegations against UT reheard by the U.S. Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
