Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
When the U.S. Supreme Court removed the Trump administration’s travel ban cases from the Oct. 10 argument slot, there was a lone case left standing for argument—a jurisdictional puzzle that would not draw nearly the attention given to the immigration challenges. The American Academy of Appellate Lawyers doesn’t file many amicus briefs in the Supreme Court, but it saw a “trap for the unwary” in the case Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago.
*May exclude premium content
Already have an account? Sign In Now
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org to learn more.