Arizona voters’ efforts to make congressional redistricting less partisan appeared to be in jeopardy Monday after the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments about the constitutionality of the arrangement.
Several justices appeared to agree with former solicitor general Paul Clement that Arizona’s independent redistricting commission would be “plainly repugnant” to the Constitution. The case is Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
