Filter This View

  • Jonus Washington v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-11
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1403-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent. Alcala, j., not participating.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because it does not contain a copy

  • Rudy Gonzales v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-06
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0081-11

    Keasler and Hervey, J.J., dissentORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(I) because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals

  • Gerardo Gutierrez v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1602-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies

  • Michael Benton Vanhooser v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1112-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) , because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appea

  • Ex Parte Keith Ashley Hubbard, Applicant

    Publication Date: 2011-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-18
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-75,819-01

    ORDER

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Georgia Construction Law Handbook 2024

    Authors: T. BART GARY, JAKE CARROLL

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Ex Parte Pedro Palomo Lucio, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-08
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0842-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3 and 68.4(i), because the petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and it doe

  • Ray Freeman Mcchristian v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-18
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1752-10, 1753-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 c

  • Juan Reyes Rivera, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-05-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-25
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0635-11

    KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates f Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See

  • Robert Lee Menefee v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1568-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the co

  • Charles Winton Land, Jr., Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-08
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1560-10,, PD-1561-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court