The New Jersey Supreme Court heard arguments March 17 over whether it should expand the ability of injured plaintiffs to use the “mode of operation” doctrine and make it easier for them to prove premises liability claims.
An attorney representing a plaintiff whose award of damages was overturned because the trial judge charged the jury with the mode of operations doctrine asked the court to reinstate the award and said the Appellate Division read the doctrine too narrowly.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
