X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Recitation, as required by CPLR §2219(A), of the papers considered in the review of this Motion for: Miscellaneous PAPERS NYSCEF NUMBERED Notice of Motion and Affidavits Annexed       69-72 Order to Show Cause and Affidavits Annexed Answering Affidavits         73-75 Replying Affidavits Exhibits Stipulations Other Decision/Order Upon the foregoing cited papers, the Decision/Order in this Motion is as follows: Petitioner’s attorney and the attorney for Respondent Roan Lindo have appeared today. The parties settled this holdover proceeding on April 20, 2023, and pursuant to their stipulation of settlement,1 Respondent consented to the entry of a judgment of possession and warrant of eviction; Respondent agreed to vacate the subject premises by June 30, 2023, and execution of the warrant of eviction was stayed to that date; Petitioner agreed to “waive all rent”; Respondent agreed not to “rent out [the] apartment to [third] parties”; Respondent agreed to give Petitioner the apartment keys and Petitioner agreed to provide a receipt; any property left by Respondent after moving out would be deemed abandoned; the parties acknowledged that Respondent had already received their security deposit; and upon timely vacating the subject premises, the judgment and warrant would be vacated, among other terms. The relief requested in Petitioner’s notice of motion is described as: “An order for a determination of the monthly use and occupancy by the Respondent since January 17, 2020 for the failure to abide by the terms of a stipulation dated April 20, 2023 by failing to vacate the premises as per the term of a signed stipulation between the parties.” The specific relief is not articulated again or clarified in the supporting affirmation. Petitioner alleges that Respondent moved out of the subject premises late and returned the keys to Petitioner even later, and that Respondent is in breach of the settlement by failing to surrender pursuant to its terms. Respondent opposes the motion on numerous grounds, including that the stipulation does not contemplate penalties for the breach now being claimed by Petitioner. Petitioner presently seeks “use and occupancy” since January 17, 2020, and Respondent argues that Petitioner agreed to waive all “rent” pursuant to the stipulation of settlement, without conditions. The relief sought by Petitioner is neither supported by the papers annexed to the motion nor the parties’ stipulation of settlement. In the event Petitioner is seeking an order determining the monthly rate of use and occupancy, the motion is completely devoid of any arguments regarding why the Court should perform such a calculation at this stage of the litigation. In the event Petitioner is seeking an order finding that Respondent owes Petitioner some amount of use and occupancy, no basis is presented for this relief either. First, as correctly pointed out by Respondent, there is no supporting affidavit by an individual with personal knowledge establishing a claim for use and occupancy arrears. No other documentation is presented in support of the alleged debt, and no claimed balance is cited. The Court also finds that the parties’ stipulation of settlement simply does not identify the payment of use and occupancy, or the instant motion, as potential penalties for Respondent’s default in vacating timely. As drafted, the only negative outcome which could befall Respondent upon failing to move out timely is that the stay of the warrant’s execution would expire. Lastly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to grant Petitioner the relief it seeks now — ostensibly, the entry of a money judgment, or an order which could form the basis of a later money judgment — because the Court has already granted a possessory judgment in favor of Petitioner, thereby concluding the holdover proceeding and the relief sought therein. See Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51 (1979). The Court need not reach the remainder of the parties’ arguments. For these reasons, Petitioner’s motion is denied. A copy of this decision and order shall be uploaded to NYSCEF. So ordered, Dated: November 21, 2023

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
May 15, 2024
Philadelphia, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.


Learn More
May 16, 2024
Dallas, TX

Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.


Learn More

Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...


Apply Now ›

Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...


Apply Now ›

Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...


Apply Now ›
04/29/2024
The National Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›