X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 9, 13, 20, 21 were read on this motion to/for       INJUNCTION/RESTRAINING ORDER. DECISION ORDER ON MOTION Upon the foregoing documents, since Respondents Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante and Alessio Di Sabatino (collectively “Respondents”) failed to appear in court for either oral argument held on August 24, 2023, and September 21, 2023, after being duly served and notified of said appearances, and since they failed to oppose Petitioner AKF Inc., D/B/A Fundkite’s (“Petitioner”) Verified Petition and motion by order to show cause, the court grants in part the Verified Petition and motion by order to show cause to the extent that the court grants a preliminary injunction in aid of arbitration, pending the resolution of the arbitration between the parties and until further order of the court, and the court restrains the funds held in Respondents Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante’s and Alessio Di Sabatino’s Wells Fargo Bank account ending 0578, titled Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante up to the amount of $98,919.00. This matter involves Petitioner’s attempt to collect on a Revenue Purchase Agreement (“RPA”), dated February 27, 2023, that Respondents allegedly defaulted on by failing to make the agreed upon weekly payments. Pursuant to the terms of the RPA, Petitioner provided Respondent Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante with $99,000.00 in funding, minus $6,125.00 in service fees and costs, for a total of $92,875.00. Respondent Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante agreed to pay back $142,560.00 of its future receipts and Respondent Alessio Di Sabatino personally guaranteed the performance under the RPA. The RPA included a 18 percent remittance percentage, with an initial estimated delivery amount of $969.80/day from its Wells Fargo Bank account ending in 0578. Petitioner alleges in substance that beginning on April 5, 2023, and again on May 5, 2023, Respondent Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante’s payments were declined by the bank for insufficient funds and Respondent Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante stopped making the required weekly payments. Petitioner further alleges that the account was closed and that Respondent Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante failed to notify Petitioner to justify closing the account and failing to make the required payments. Petitioner further alleges in substance that Petitioner is diverting its receipts because it is still in business and still generating revenue. Petitioner further alleges in substance that at the time of the default, Respondent had paid $43,641.00 of the $142,560.00 purchased amount, leaving a balance of $98,919.00 due under the RPA. Petitioner further alleges that, in addition to the $98,919.00 owed, Respondents also owe a default fee of 25 percent, or $24,729.25, for a total amount due of $123,648.75. Petitioner further alleges that it attempted to contact Respondents numerous times regarding why Respondents stopped depositing receipts into the designated accounts and to demand that Respondents restore the receipts and allow Petitioner to resume collecting the receipts, but Respondents failed to respond. Petitioner argues that since Respondents failed to respond to Petitioners, failed to deposit its receipts into the designated bank account, failed to justify the insufficient funds or any downturn or slow-down in their business, that Respondents intentionally diverted their receipts and defaulted on the RPA and that they will not make the required payments. Therefore, any arbitration award in Petitioner’s favor would be rendered ineffectual because if Respondents diverted the funds from the designated account, then there would be no funds available to satisfy any judgment rendered in favor of Petitioner. Petitioner further alleges that the RPA grants any party the right to arbitrate disputes or claims arising from the RPA and they agreed upon the forum. Petitioner now moves by order to show cause, which includes the same relief requested in the Petition, for an order restraining Respondents’ bank accounts at Wells Fargo up to $123,648.75, pursuant to CPLR 7502(c). The court declined to grant Petitioner’s request for a temporary restraining order, but directed the parties to appear in court on August 24, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., for oral argument on Petitioner’s request for a preliminary injunction to restrain Respondents’ account(s) pending the resolution of the arbitration proceedings. Petitioner complied with the service requirements set forth in the order to show cause. Respondents failed to file written opposition to Petitioner’s order to show cause, failed to file an Answer, failed to oppose the Verified Petition, failed to otherwise appear in this proceeding and failed to appear for oral argument. The court adjourned the matter to September 21, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., to give Respondents a final chance to oppose the matter or otherwise appear in this action. The court issued an Interim Decision and Order on Motion, dated September 5, 2023, including the new adjourn date and warning Respondents in substance that the court would enter a default against them should they fail to oppose the motion by order to show cause and Verified Petition or fail to appear for oral argument. The court required Petitioner to serve Respondents with the court’s Decision and Order with notice of entry within five (5) days of the date of entry of the Order and Petitioner complied. As such, Respondents are in default. Here, the court determines that Petitioner demonstrated its entitlement to the relief requested in the order to show cause and Petition as set forth herein. The court finds that Petitioner demonstrated its need for the restraint on Respondent Bella Vita LLC’s d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante’s Wells Fargo bank account ending 0578, which was the account designated in the RPA, but only up to $98,919.00. Additionally, Petitioner demonstrated that it is likely to succeed on the merits, that Respondents owe the money and that Petitioner will suffer irreparable injury if the preliminary injunction is not granted. Therefore, the court grants in part Petitioner’s order to show cause and the relief requested in the Verified Petition, without opposition, to the extent that the court grants a preliminary injunction in aid of arbitration, pending the resolution of the arbitration between the parties and until further order of the court, and the court restrains all funds in Respondent Bella Vita LLC’s d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante’s Wells Fargo bank account ending in 0578, up to the amount of $98,919.00. The court declines to restrain the additional $24,729.25 for the 25 percent default fee or to restrain any additional bank account. The court has considered any additional arguments raised by Petitioner which were not specifically discussed herein and the court denies any additional requests for relief not expressly granted herein. As such, it appearing to this court that a cause of action exists in favor of Petitioner as against Respondents Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante and Alessio Di Sabatino and that Petitioner is entitled to a preliminary injunction on the ground that Respondents threaten or are about to do, or are doing or procuring or suffering to be done, an act in violation of Petitioner’s rights respecting the subject of the action and tending to render the judgment ineffectual, as set forth above, it is hereby ORDERED that the court grants in part Petitioner AKF Inc., d/b/a Fundkite’s motion by order to show cause filed under motion sequence 001 and relief requested in its Verified Petition, without opposition, to the extent set forth herein; and it is further ORDERED that the undertaking is fixed in the sum of $1,000.00 conditioned that the Petitioner, if it is finally determined that it was not entitled to an injunction, will pay to the Respondents all damages and costs which may be sustained by reason of this injunction; and it is further ORDERED that the court grants a preliminary injunction in aid of arbitration, pending the resolution of the arbitration between the parties and until further order of the court; the court restrains all funds held by Respondent Bella Vita LLC d/b/a Sabatino’s Italian Ristorante’s Wells Fargo Bank account ending in 0578, up to the amount of $98,919.00, but denies the remainder of the relief requested in the Verified Petition and motion by order to show cause; and it is further ORDERED that by granting the requested relief, the court disposes of Petitioner’s Verified Petition and motion by order to show cause filed under motion sequence 001. This constitutes the decision and order of the court. CHECK ONE: X  CASE DISPOSED   NON-FINAL DISPOSITION   GRANTED              DENIED X               GRANTED IN PART       OTHER APPLICATION:   SETTLE ORDER    SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE:                INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN     FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE Dated: September 27, 2023

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
June 20, 2024
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
June 27, 2024
New York

Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.


Learn More

Vice President of Legal Affairs and General Counsel Department: Office of the General Counsel Reports To: University President Posi...


Apply Now ›

Cole Schotz P.C.Litigation Associate New Jersey OfficeProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks an assoc...


Apply Now ›

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York, NY office for a non-partnership track litigation associate. The ideal candidate ...


Apply Now ›
04/29/2024
The National Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›