X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The following papers read on this Order to Show Cause by defendant, Aristides Ferreras (“defendant”) to vacate a judgment entered against him. Papers Numbered Order to Show Cause — Affidavit      1 Affirmation in Opposition — Exhibits   2 Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that the application is determined as follows: This is an action for non-payment of a promissory note in connection with a lease agreement for a vehicle, executed by defendant on May 4, 2015. Plaintiff has alleged that in April 2017, defendant defaulted on the subject note. The record reflects that prior to defendant’s default, in January 2017, the vehicle was impounded due to unpaid parking violations. On February 3, 2017, plaintiff paid $1,231.00 to retrieve the vehicle from the impound. By letter dated February 3, 2017, a repossession notice was allegedly sent to defendants, and on April 18, 2017, the vehicle was sold for $1,200.00. Plaintiff avers that on June 22, 2017, defendant was notified of the sale and of the remaining balance of $3,507.10. On October 18, 2021, a default money judgment was entered by the Clerk of Queens County against defendants in the amount of $7,378.27. The court notes that the judgment amount consisted of $3,212.85 and interest in the amount of $3,581.37. An income execution prepared by plaintiff dated October 20, 2021 to garnish defendant’s wages was issued against defendant. However, the income execution, annexed to plaintiff’s opposition, is incomplete and does not meet the requirements, pursuant to CPLR 5231(g). Further, plaintiff fails to submit proof of service of the income execution upon the sheriff and defendant (see CPLR 5231 [d]; [e]). Defendant, pro se, moves by Order to Show Cause with Emergency Affidavit signed on October 26, 2021 by Justice Ulysses B. Leverett to vacate the judgment and enjoin plaintiff from garnishing or from continuing to garnish defendant’s wages. Plaintiff opposes. Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27-b (a) (1), “[a]t the time of filing with the clerk the proof of service of the summons and complaint in an action arising from a consumer credit transaction, or at any time thereafter, the plaintiff shall submit to the clerk a stamped unsealed envelope addressed to the defendant together with a written notice, in both English and Spanish…” Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27-b (a) (2), “[n]o default judgment based on defendant’s failure to answer shall be entered unless there has been compliance with this subdivision and at least 20 days have elapsed from the date of mailing by the clerk.” Plaintiff has not submitted proof of compliance with the additional notice requirement in obtaining a judgment against defendant. In light of the above, plaintiff is hereby enjoined from garnishing or from continuing to garnish defendant’s wages. Only if plaintiff has already served the income execution upon defendant’s employer, Marks Homecare Agency Inc., shall plaintiff personally serve it with a copy of this order within 20 days of entry. Plaintiff shall personally serve defendant with a copy of this order within 20 days of entry. Plaintiff shall e-file proof of service. Accordingly, defendant’s application to vacate the judgment, is granted and the action is dismissed. Dated: January 26, 2022

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
May 15, 2024
Philadelphia, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.


Learn More
May 16, 2024
Dallas, TX

Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.


Learn More

Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...


Apply Now ›

Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...


Apply Now ›

Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...


Apply Now ›
04/29/2024
The National Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›