Appellate Division, Second Department: May 6, 2020

By Rivera, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix, Duffy, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF MARK T. (ANONYMOUS), app; SUSAN STABINSKY, ETC., res — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered January 11, 2019, on the ground that it has been rendered academic, or, in the alternative, to extend the time to serve and file a brief. Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further, ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is extended, and on or before July 6, 2020, the respondent shall serve the respondent’s brief and upload a digital copy of the respondent’s brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court’s website, and file an original and five hard copies of the respondent’s brief in accordance with any applicable administrative order or other order to be issued by the Court. RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS-RADIX and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

By Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Roman, Iannacci, JJ. THE PEOPLE, ETC., res, v. CARLOS GUZMAN, app — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered January 15, 2020, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel. Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant’s affidavit setting forth (1) the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel in the trial court, and (2) if on bail before conviction, the amount and source of the bail money, and if bail was the appellant’s own money, what happened to the same after conviction. MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.