By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Anna Bogunova, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5018411) — Application by Anna Bogunova, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 6, 2012, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Anna Pereira.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Anna Bogunova to Anna Pereira, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Carmen Rubette James, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 2123032) — Application by Carmen Rubette James, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on April 22, 1987, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Carmen R. James-Lawrence.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Carmen Rubette James to Carmen R. James-Lawrence, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Melissa Ann Peace, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5084595) — Application by Melissa Ann Peace, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on March 20, 2013, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Melissa Peace Tomaino.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Melissa Ann Peace to Melissa Peace Tomaino, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Katina Natasha Fortunato, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5435656) — Application by Katina Natasha Fortunato, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on April 27, 2016, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Katina Fortunato Baren.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Katina Natasha Fortunato to Katina Fortunato Baren, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Marisa Erin Fox, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5050299) — Application by Marisa Erin Fox, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on September 5, 2012, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Marisa Erin Wolpert.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Marisa Erin Fox to Marisa Erin Wolpert, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Ahbra Loretta Williams, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5317417) — Application by Ahbra Loretta Williams, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on April 1, 2015, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Ahbra Williams Moses.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Ahbra Loretta Williams to Ahbra Williams Moses, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Rebecca Kathryn Richards, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 5088893) — Application by Rebecca Kathryn Richards, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on February 27, 2013, to change her name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law to Rebecca Kathryn Cuneo.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change the applicant’s name on the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law from Rebecca Kathryn Richards to Rebecca Kathryn Cuneo, effective immediately.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Francisca Petrescu, res, v. Corneliu Petrescu, ap — Appeal by Corneliu Petrescu from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 12, 2018. By dated March 7, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the dated March 7, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 11, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Ramal M. (Anonymous), Jr. Cardinal Mccloskey Services, petitioner-res, Teiyana T. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Teiyana T. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 28, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated February 28, 2018, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal, and was directed, inter alia, to contact the appellant and determine the appellant’s interest in perfecting the appeal:Joan N. G. James26 Court Street, Suite 2610Brooklyn, NY 11242718-624-4211By letter dated April 4, 2018, assigned counsel notified the Court that she has been unable to contact the appellant.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the assigned counsel for the appellant and dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 10, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties or their attorneys, and upon the appellant, by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Dina K. Nickel, res, v. Keith M. Nickel, ap, — Appeals by Keith M. Nickel from four orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, all dated March 1, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Israel Napoleon Castillo, dated April 10, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Darla A. Filiberto1770 Motor Parkway, Suite 300Hauppauge, NY 11788631-232-1130and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before May 3, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeals, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeals, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeals, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Sgroi, Lasalle and Barros, JJ.Shaindy Weichman, plf, v. Yecheskel C. Weichman, def — Motion by Shaindy Weichman for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 30, 2016, and, inter alia, to vacate the order dated November 30, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Matter of Scott I. R. (Anonymous), ap — Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Shaheed B. (Anonymous) res — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 18, 2017, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.Matter of Scott I. R. (Anonymous), ap — Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Shaheed B. (Anonymous) res — Appeal by Scott I. R. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Etienne Locoh-Donou, pet, v. Kimberly Locoh, res — Motion by Kimberly Locoh for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated February 28, 2018, and to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Disa Realty, Inc., res, v. Kishor Rao, etc., ap, et al., def — 2016-06948Disa Realty, Inc., respondent,v Kishor Rao, etc., appellant,et al., defendants.(Index No. 10206/12) Disa Realty, Inc., respondent,v Kishor Rao, etc., appellant,et al., defendants.(Index No. 9880/12) Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action under Index No. 9880/12 pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 18, 2017, to strike the note of issue and certificate of readiness in the above-entitled action under Index No. 9880/12, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order entered July 18, 2017, and to consolidate that appeal with appeals from an order and a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 24, 2013, and June 8, 2016, respectively, in the above-entitled action under Index No. 10206/12.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order entered July 18, 2017, is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect that appeal is enlarged until June 18, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Seabring, LLC, res, v. Elegance Restaurant Furniture Corp. ap — Motion by the appellants on appeals from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 5, 2017, and a judgment of the same court dated September 5, 2017, to stay enforcement of the judgment and to stay the respondent, or anyone acting on its behalf, from taking any action, inter alia, to encumber their property or accounts, pending hearing and determination of the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.MATTER of Eric Siles, res, v. Luisa Siles, ap — Appeal by Luisa Siles from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated February 28, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Ariana M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Edward M. M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Serina M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Edward M. M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Samuel M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Edward M. M. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 3) — Appeals by Edward M. M. from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 29, 2017, and March 9, 2018, respectively. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Lindsay Long-Waldor, dated April 6, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeals, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:Michael A. FiechterP.O. Box 1107Bellmore, NY 11710718-902-4492and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this Court, and on or before May 3, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeals, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeals, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeals, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeals, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeals, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Candie Means, ap, v. Derrick Anthony Miller, Jr., res — Appeal by Candie Means from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Heather Fischthal, res, v. Bennet Fischthal, ap — Appeal by Bennet Fischthal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 20, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Romeo O. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Sita P.-M. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-appellants res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Autumn M. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Sita P.-M. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-appellants res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Lanlia A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Sita P.-M. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-appellants res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Don O. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Sita P.-M. (Anonymous), et al., respondents-appellants res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-14736-16, N-14737-16) — Separate appeals by Sita P.-M. and Vincent M. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 31, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the petitioner-respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 18, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Michael M. L. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, MacThaddeus L. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeals by MacThaddeus L. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 25, 2017, and September 5, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 21, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.U.S. Bank, National Association, res, v. Phulmattie Sookhai def — Frederick Sookhai, nonparty-appellant — 2018-03228Frederick Sookhai, etc., appellant,v Edward Rugino, etc. respondents.(Index No. 285/18) Motion by Frederick Sookhai for leave to appeal to this Court from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, one entered August 14, 2017, and one dated March 12, 2018, to stay his eviction from the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of the appeals, and to consolidate the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal from the order entered August 14, 2017, is denied as unnecessary as that order is appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701); and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal from the order dated March 12, 2018, is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal purportedly taken as of right from the order dated March 12, 2018, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay the movant’s eviction from the subject premises is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Yu Wei, res, v. Robert Mathews, ap — Appeal by Robert Mathews from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (IDV Part), dated January 23, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 18, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Luz Martos Vega, ap, v. Marvin Suitt, res — Appeal by Luz Martos Vega from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated July 6, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 16, 2018.By Duffy, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Bryan Bistonath, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 17, 2016, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Cohen, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Franklyn Soleyn, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 6, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Joseph Olmann, etc., ap, v. Willoughby Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, LLC, et al., res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 11, 2016, and June 20, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 30, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.Americore Drilling & Cutting, Inc., res, v. EMB Contracting Corp. ap — Separate motions by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until June 8, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ respective briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., res, v. Toni Simons, appellant def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 11, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 21, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be grantedDILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.MATTER of Ayesha Khan, res, v. Mahmudul H. Khan, ap — Appeal by Mahmudul H. Khan from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 28, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 16, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, res, v. Kerry Grover, etc., ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 21, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Lasalle, JJ.Thomas Schlapa, ap, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until May 21, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Igor Vaysman, res, v. Amy Conroy, ap — V-902-13) — Motion by the attorney for the child to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 4, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 3, 2018, and the brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Ely Lyakhovich, etc. ap, v. Alexander Vernov, etc. res — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 5, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until May 21, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., ap, v. Kevin Wilson, etc., respondent def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 21, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Willan Enrique Macas Aguilar, res, v. Graham Terrace, LLC defendants third-party plaintiffs-res-ap, Atweek, Inc., etc., defendant third-party defendant-appellant-res, et al., third-party def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 21, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.J-K Apparel Sales Co., Inc. respondents- ap, v. Irwin Jacobs, defendant third- party plaintiff-appellant-res, J-K Apparel Sales Co., Inc. third-party plaintiffs- appellants-res, Steve Kenger, third-party def-res — Motion by the respondents-appellants and the third-party defendant-respondent on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 31, 2017, for leave to serve and file a supplemental record containing a certain document and the transcript of certain proceedings. Cross motion by the defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant-respondent and the third-party plaintiffs-appellants-respondents to strike the answering brief filed by the respondents-appellants and the third-party defendant-respondent, and to enlarge their time to serve and file a reply brief. Application by the third-party plaintiffs-appellants-respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their reply brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion and the application are granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the brief filed by the respondents-appellants and the third-party defendant-respondent is stricken, and on or before May 21, 2018, the respondents-appellants and the third-party defendant-respondent shall serve and file a brief which does not refer to matter dehors the record and includes the points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]); and it is further,ORDERED that the time of the defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant-respondent and the third-party plaintiffs-appellants-respondents to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until June 4, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.MATTER of Lisa Castellotti, res, v. Peter Castellotti, ap — Appeal by Peter Castellotti from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated October 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 10, 2018.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Rawl A. Jones, res, v. New York City Transit Authority, etc., ap — Motion by the respondent on an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 18, 2017, for leave to discharge retained counsel and to assign pro bono counsel, or, in the alternative, for leave to proceed pro se, in effect, to direct the appellant to serve and file a supplemental record which contains a complete copy of the DCAS Personnel Service Bulletin 200-6R, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for leave to discharge retained counsel and for leave to proceed pro se are denied as unnecessary; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to assign pro bono counsel is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, to direct the appellant to serve and file a supplemental record is granted, and on or before May 11, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record which contains a complete copy of the DCAS Personnel Service Bulletin 200-6R; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 11, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.JPMorgan Chase, NA, res, v. Patricia Medley, etc., ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated June 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Terence L. Keys, ap — Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 23, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the appellant and the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 7, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Rivera, J.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. John H. Dixon, ap — Motion by the appellant pursuant to CPL 460.20, for a certificate granting leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from a decision and order of this Court dated February 7, 2018, which denied his application for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 20, 2016 (People v. Dixon, 138 AD3d 1016), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 20, 2012.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.Edison J. Kang ap, v. Jeremy P. Cotty def, Panagiotis Locasto, res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Global Health Services, LLC, res, v. Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, P.C., et al., ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Global Health Services, LLC, res, v. Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, P.C., et al., ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Judy Zhou, etc. res, v. Tuxedo Ridge, LLC ap — 2018-01540, 2018-02222, 2018-02608Judy Zhou, etc. respondents,v Tuxedo Ridge, LLC appellants.(Index No. 1229/14) Motion by the respondents to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 15, 2017, on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated upon entry of a judgment of the same court in the above-entitled action on January 9, 2018, or, in the alternative, to consolidate the appeal from the order entered February 15, 2017, with the appeals from the judgment and two orders of the same court entered December 19, 2017, and January 31, 2018, respectively, and to enlarge the time to serve and file briefs.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order entered February 15, 2017, is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondents’ time to serve and file brief with respect to the appeal from the order entered February 15, 2017, is granted, and the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief, which addresses only that appeal, is enlarged until May 21, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondents’ time to serve and file a separate brief with respect to the appeals from the judgment and two orders entered December 19, 2017, and January 31, 2018, is granted, and the respondents’ time to serve and file a separate brief, which addresses only those appeals, is enlarged until May 21, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals will be calendared together and will be argued or submitted on the same date.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Cohen and Barros, JJ.Israel Kozlik res, v. Collette Wallace, appellant def — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 2017, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the consent of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.Liliana Bedoya res, v. Hackley School ap — Applications by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Leventhal, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Jonas Equities, Inc. plf, 495 East 7th Street Corporation ap, v. New York State Division of Human Rights, respondent def — Motion by the appellants, inter alia, to extend the time to comply with a decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 29, 2017, on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 29, 2017, is granted and, on or before May 11, 2018, the appellants shall serve and file a supplemental record containing a transcript of the proceedings which occurred on March 9, 2017; and it is further,ORDERED that no further extensions of time to serve and file the supplemental record shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.Matter of Alan Belsky ap, v. Robert Laga res, Jay Moskowitz res-res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated June 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Angelique Finamore, ap, v. Paul Finamore, res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 30, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 11, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Yehuda Michael, ap, v. Feixia Wei-Fisher, res — F-1160-15/16C) — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated July 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Jill Murphy Calderon, ap, v. Vincent A. Calderon, res — F-2468-08/16V) — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 10, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.2009-06541, 2012-10114 ORDER ON MOTION MATTER of Thomas C. Brooks, Jr., a suspended attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4160040) — Thomas C. Brooks, Jr., was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on October 22, 2003. By opinion and order of this Court dated April 3, 2012, under Appellate Division Docket No. 2009-06541, Mr. Brooks was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, commencing May 3, 2012. By opinion and order of this Court dated September 24, 2014, under Appellate Division Docket No. 2012-10114, Mr. Brooks was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective immediately, in addition to the period of suspension imposed in the prior separate disciplinary proceeding. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 20, 2017, a motion by Mr. Brooks for reinstatement to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on his character and fitness to practice law. By letter dated April 11, 2018, Mr. Brooks asks to withdraw his motion for reinstatement to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law.Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 20, 2017, is recalled and vacated, and the motion for reinstatement to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law is deemed withdrawn.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.U.S. Bank National Association, etc., ap, v. Jeffrey Hermann respondents def — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 1, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Gentian Hysa, res, v. State of New York, ap — (Claim No. 123282) — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Court of Claims dated November 30, 2015.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 16, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Gilbert Santoro res, v. Capital One Financial Corporation, etc., et al., appellants-res, John Brown, et al., respondents-ap — Application by the appellant-respondent Capital One Financial Corporation on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 18, 2017, to withdraw its appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Capital One Financial Corporation is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC, res, v. Gabriella Hurst appellants def — Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, and a judgment of the same court, both entered June 27, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until June 19, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Sharrie Hajcuk-Gillespie plaintiffs- res, Dylan King ap, Karen M. Dunphy def-res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 17, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 6, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Joseph Johnson, res, v. West 60th Street, LLC, def, West 60th Street Development, LLC ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Yulia Gorbatyuk, plf-res, v. Oleg Chulichokov, ap, Isay Klin, def-res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Rivera, J.P.; Dillon, Nelson and Christopher, JJ.Alksandr Yanovskiy, res, v. Tims Diagnostics Center def, Cirami Irrevocable Trust ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated October 9, 2015.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties dated April 11, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Matter of Hillcrest Fire Company No. 1, et al., ap, v. Town of Ramapo res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated June 29, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Matter of Lena Bodin ap, v. Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo, et al., respondents-respondents res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated June 30, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Pedro Pena, res, v. Rosa Tiburcio, ap — Appeal by Rosa Tiburcio from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 6, 2016.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the branch of the appellant’s motion which was to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal, which was previously held in abeyance by decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 10, 2017, is denied as academic.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.CDC Development Properties, Inc., appellant- res, v. American Independent Paper Mills Supply Company, Inc., res-ap, et al., def — Appeal by CDC Development Properties, Inc., and cross appeal by American Independent Paper Mills Supply Company, Inc., from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 29, 2017.Now, on the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Silvana Tardio, etc., appellant-res, v. Anthony G. Saleh, etc., res-ap, Anthony Bertelle, etc., res — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 5, 2017, and an appeal from a judgment of the same court dated July 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged, and the joint record and appellant-respondent’s brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court are accepted for filing and deemed timely served; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file an answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).
