MATTER of Louis E. Goebel, a/k/a Louis Emil Goebel, a/k/a Louis Goebel, a/k/a Lou Goebel, deceased. Susan J. Rera, etc., petitioner-appellant; Alba Baris Goebel, res-res — (File No. 911/11) — 2017-03236MATTER of Louis E. Goebel, also known as Louis Emil Goebel, a/k/a Louis Goebel, a/k/a Lou Goebel, deceased. Susan J. Rera, etc., petitioner-appellant; Alba Baris Goebel, respondent-respondent.(File No. 911/11) 2017-05751, 2017-05752MATTER of Louis E. Goebel, also known as Louis Emil Goebel, a/k/a Louis Goebel, a/k/a Lou Goebel, deceased. Susan J. Rera, etc., petitioner-appellant; Alba Baris Goebel, respondent-respondent.(File No. 911/11) 2017-08534MATTER of Louis E. Goebel, also known as Louis Emil Goebel, a/k/a Louis Goebel, a/k/a Lou Goebel, deceased. Susan J. Rera, etc., petitioner-respondent; Alba Baris Goebel, respondent-respondent; Frank D’Onofrio, nonparty-appellant; Helen Depolito, nonparty-respondent.(File No. 911/11) Motion by the nonparty-appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Orange County, dated April 24, 2017, to consolidate that appeal with appeals from a decree of the same court dated August 14, 2014, and three orders of the same court dated October 13, 2015, March 10, 2017, and April 24, 2017, respectively, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the order dated April 24, 2017, on the ground that the nonparty-appellant is not aggrieved by that order (see CPLR 5511), by filing an affidavit or affirmation on that issue with the Clerk of this Court on or before December 22, 2017, and by serving one copy of the same on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion by the nonparty-appellant is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, shall serve a copy of this order to show cause on the parties to the appeals by regular mail.HALL, J.P., COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Maltese, Lasalle and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Martin Davis, a/k/a Morton Davidson, deceased. Theresa Padilla, petitioner-res, Roger Davis, res-res — (File No. 358812) — Motion by the respondent-appellant to enlarge the record on an appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated September 6, 2016, to include certain documents in a proposed appendix as well as unspecified documents in “the [g]uardianship proceedings” and to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the respondent-appellant’s appendix.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the record is denied as unnecessary as to the documents in the proposed appendix and denied as to unspecified documents in “the [g]uardianship proceedings”; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the respondent-appellant’s appendix is granted.ROMAN, J.P., MALTESE, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.MATTER of Pedro G. T. (Anonymous). Carolyn Sanchez, etc., appellant; Candice A. Pluchino, etc., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, all dated April 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Janet Vagt Scully, ap, v. Town of Mamaroneck res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Ari Yemini, both individually and in his capacity as a member of Peninsula Holdings, LLC res, v. Oded Goldberg, et al., appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Thomas Schlapa, ap, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 10, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Ena D. Narine, ap, v. Kevin Manoo, et al., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Guy-Michel Philogene ap, v. Ronald G. Duckett, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 9, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Reno G. Discala res, v. Boulevard Associates II, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2017, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee of the Home Equity Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Trust Series INABS 2005-B, Home Equity Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series INABS 2005-B Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated June 1, 2005, res, v. Gus Semertgis, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 2015, and October 27, 2015, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 16, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Angelo Palladino, Jr. ap, v. New York City Housing Authority, res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Susan Berman ap, v. David Bowman res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 2, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 22, 2017, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Carver Federal Savings Bank, ap, v. Melady Baptiste, a/k/a Melady Jean-Baptiste def, Maryse Jean Baptiste, a/k/a Maryse Jean-Baptiste, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Leventhal, J.P.; Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Tomer Chazbani, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 20, 2015, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated August 30, 2017, to direct the Office of the District Attorney of Queens County, to return his passport to him and to direct the New York City Department of Finance to issue a check payable to him in the amount of $50,000. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 1, 2015, the appellant’s motion pursuant to CPL 460.50 for a stay of execution of the judgment was granted on condition, inter alia, that the appellant deposit the sum of $50,000 cash bail and surrender his passport to the Office of the District Attorney of Queens County.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the Office of the District Attorney of Queens County, is directed to return the appellant’s passport to him on or before December 15, 2017, the $50,000 bail is exonerated, and, upon presentation of a copy of this decision and order on motion and production of the signed bail receipts to the New York City Department of Finance, the $50,000 bail, less statutory costs, shall be paid by a check made payable to Carmella Chazbani, and the motion is otherwise denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Andy M. Gayot, a/k/a Andrew Gayot, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County, both rendered July 27, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 18, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Anonymous 1, a minor, by parent and natural guardian, Anonymous 2, ap, v. Green Chimneys Childrens Services, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Astro Air Corporation, res, v. L. D. Wenger Construction Co., Inc., appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 21, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Natraj Gandham, plf-res, v. Rama Gandham, appellant; Tanjila Ahmed, nonparty-res — Application by the plaintiff-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 23, 2017, and March 8, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the plaintiff-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the plaintiff-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.The Board of Managers of the One Three Three Condominium, res, v. Water Street Realty Group, LLC, def, Yaron Hershco, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.US Bank National Association, ap, v. Ahura Halevy, respondent def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 18, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Ryan T. G. (Anonymous). Todd Galinus petitioners-res, Elissa Haden, objectant-ap — (File No. 480/16) — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Orange County, dated January 26, 2017Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Vincent Perretti, ap, v. Ghassan Joseph Samara, etc. res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 19, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Saca Discount Corp., res, v. 33-02 30th Avenue, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Hector Rivera, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed October 20, 2009, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of the imposition of resentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant’s resentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the resentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Seymour W. James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the Court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc., res, v. Gail Palmore-Archer, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 13, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 19, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nathaniel Wilson, res, v. Linda Mazewski ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.S. P., infant by father and natural guardian Arye Perl, res, v. Dongbu Insurance Co. ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Elia Hernandez-Bueno, ap, v. Alicia Perez, res — Appeal by Elia Hernandez-Bueno from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 26, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Michael S. Somma, Jr., Esq., dated November 9, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Nicole Barnum, Esq.225 Broadway, Suite 2605New York, NY 10007917-371-7241and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before December 15, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Calvin L. Tarpley res, v. New York City Transit Authority ap — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Jeanette Burro, as administrator of the estate of Jean Ferrante, deceased res, v. Pritpal Kang, def, Dyker Emergency Physicians, P.C., et al., ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2017, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Todd Dahlia, res, v. S & K Distribution, LLC, doing business as New Castle Building Products, appellant def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until December 20, 2017, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated March 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 13, 2017, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Ernestine Washington, appellant-res, v. County of Nassau res-ap, Jonathan O. Talit res — Application by the appellant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Raymond Wade, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered October 24, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Saad A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Umda M. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Umda M. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 11, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Laura Eraso, Esq., dated Novemeber 15, 2017, it isORDERED that the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Center for Family Representation, Inc.89-14 Parsons Boulevard, Second FloorJamaica, NY 11432and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this order has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Candice Burke, ap, v. Vincent Umbaca, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 18, 2017, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MJK Building Corp. ap, v. Fayland Realty, Inc. res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PE-NC, LLC, res, v. Edward Gonzalez, etc. appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 4, 2018, to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 22, 2017, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Pitsy, LLC, res, v. Elliot Rindenow, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 18, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Mohammed Islam, res, v. Christopher Destefano, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 20, 2017, and December 7, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 26, 2017, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Town of Hempstead, ap, v. Long Beach RD Realty, LLC res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 21, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of The Miness Family Trust Dated October 10, 1988. Saul Fenchel, petitioner-res, Mark Miness objectants-ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of The Miness Family Trust Dated October 10, 1988. Francis W. Deegan, petitioner-res, Mark Miness objectants-ap — (Proceeding No. 2) (File Nos. 2012-369167/B, 2012-369167/A) — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated January 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Julie Lambrianakos, petitioner- res, v. John Michael Lambros, res, Melissa Marler, ap — Appeal by Melissa Marler from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 31, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 22, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.Pamela Coakley, res-ap, v. Regal Cinemas, Inc. res, Seating Concepts, LLC, etc., appellant-res, et al., defendant (and a third-party action). — Application by the respondent-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 24, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent-appellant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the respondent-appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Michael Dolan, res, v. New Hyde Park Fire Department ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 23-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 18, 2017, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Martin J. Ain ap, v. Allstate Insurance Company, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 1, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Stacy Morris-Punter, plf-res, v. Interprop Bedford, LLC, def, ACHS Management Corp. def-res, B&R Concrete and Excavation Corp., appellant (and third-party actions). — Application by the defendants-respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Seeraj Ramrattan ap, v. Resorts World Casino res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of William Bissett, ap, v. Donna Hillenberg, res — Appeal by William Bissett from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 17, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of James Patrick McCarrick, Esq., dated November 24, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Susan A. DeNatale, Esq.982 Montauk Highway, Suite 6Bayport, NY 11705631-772-1246and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before December 15, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Adesoji Sodamade ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated August 17, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until December 21, 2017, the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.US Bank, NA, res, v. Marisol Villatoro appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated September 26, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until December 21, 2017, the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Witold Moroz, res, v. The City of New York ap — 2017-05228Witold Moroz, respondent, v. The Cityof New York appellants.(Index No. 500168/17)Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file briefs on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 9, 2017, and April 20, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file briefs is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the respondent’s briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC, ap, v. Charles Lev, res, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Calman Greenberg, as representative of the estate of Ruth Greenberg, ap, v. Grace Plaza Nursing & Rehabilitation Center res — Separate applications by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 20, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the respondents’ briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Roberto C. E.-C. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Roberto C. E.-C. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 5, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 3, 2018.MATTER of Monique Nikole Sellers, ap, v. Derek Jobete Gardner, res — Appeal by Monique Nikole Sellers from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 19, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 5, 2018.MATTER of Kelly M. Coventry, res, v. Brian K. Coventry, ap — Appeals by Brian K. Coventry from three orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, all dated May 26, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 22, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed within 30 days of the date of this order.MATTER of Cheryl P. (Anonymous). Orange County Commissioner of Social Services, petitioner-res, Ayanna M. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Ayanna M. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated March 7, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the petitioner-respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.Dustan Mehtvin, as the administrator of the estate of Shannen Lyles, deceased ap, v. Bala K. Ravi, etc. res — Separate applications by the respondents Bala K. Ravi, Derek Liang, and Wyckoff Heights Medical Center pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until December 20, 2017, and the respondents’ briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.Fran Chan, ap, v. 19 West 24th Street Holder, LLC, respondent def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Duffy, JJ.Eric Krobath, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, res, v. South Nassau Communities Hospital, etc., appellant def — Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 12, 2016. Separate motion by the respondent for leave to file an unredacted copy of his brief under seal and an addendum to the respondent’s brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to stay all proceedings is granted and all proceedings in the above-entitled action are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to file an unredacted copy of the respondent’s brief under seal is granted and on or before December 21, 2017, the respondent shall file nine copies of the unredacted brief, under seal, for in camera review by the panel of Justices assigned to the appeal, and the unreadcated copy of the brief shall remain sealed upon filing; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to file an addendum to the respondent’s brief is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Shanell L. Curtis, ap, v. Tysheem C. Alexander, res — Appeal by Shanell L. Curtis from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 16, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Richard A. Miller, Esq., dated October 14, 2017, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Linda C. Braunsberg, Esq.370 Powell Street, Apt. 2Staten Island, NY 10312718-637-4479and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by the Court, and on or before December 15, 2017, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that she has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Emiliano Ermini, pet-ap, v. Viviana Vittori, res, Genci Bilali nonparty-ap — V-3112-16/16A, V-3111-16/16A, O-506-12/16C) — Appeal by Emiliano Ermini, Genci Bilali, and Bilali & Associates, LLC, from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated July 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellants’ brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018.MATTER of Drew W. Matsen, res, v. Megan E. Matsen, ap — V-5856-16/16A, V-5857-16/16A, V-848-17/17A, V-849-17/17A) — Appeal by Megan E. Matsen from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 28, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 27, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Kyle C. (Anonymous), appellant-child. Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Daniel C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Ryan C. (Anonymous), appellant-child. Nassau County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Daniel C. (Anonymous), res-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Kyle C. and Ryan C. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated February 17, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellants’ brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Michael A. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Claudia A. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Claudia A. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 16, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Dupree M. (Anonymous), ap — Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Samantha Q. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Dupree M. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated February 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent Samantha Q. to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2017.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Tanya Marie Kaiser Robinson, ap, v. Ricky Wayne Robinson, res — Motion by Tanya Marie Kaiser Robinson for a determination that an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 25, 2017, is appealable as of right or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to this Court from the order dated October 25, 2017, and to stay enforcement of the order pending hearing and determination of the appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a determination that the order dated October 25, 2017, is appealable as of right or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to this Court from the order dated October 25, 2017, is granted to the extent that the order dated October 25, 2017, is appealable as of right and is otherwise denied as unnecessary (see CPLR 5701); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Miller, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Arthur A. Small, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated March 20, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Malkie Wiederman, res, v. Isaac Halpert ap — Motion by the appellants to stay enforcement of stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 19, 2017, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Duffy, Connolly and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Sarah J. A. (Anonymous). Putnam County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Ramadan G. O.-A. (Anonymous), res-res — Motion by the respondent-appellant for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Putnam County, dated March 28, 2016, and October 28, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., DUFFY, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Carmine DePalma ap, v. Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corp., et al., def, Cooperfield Investments, LLC res — Motion by Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corp. and Private Capital Group, LLC, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 31, 2017, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is dismissed as the movants do not have standing to make the motion as they are not respondents on the appeal.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Priscilla Hall, J.P.; Roman, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ.MATTER of State of New York, res, v. Richard S. (Anonymous), ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 22, 2017, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 19, 2014, is amended by deleting from the second paragraph thereof the words “no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto” and substituting therefor the words “the papers filed in opposition thereto.”HALL, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Cohen, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Susan R. Gavin, ap, v. Lawrence J. Worner, res — Motion by the appellant to reinstate an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated April 22, 2016, which was dismissed by decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Eng, P.J.; Leventhal, Hall and Sgroi, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Huguens Souhaite, ap — (S.C.I. No. 5/07) — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered October 10, 2007, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated February 3, 2009, and for leave to reargue his prior motion to waive payment of restitution, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 27, 2017. Separate motion by the appellant pursuant to CPLR 3215 “for leave to enter a judgment upon default” against the respondent.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motions are denied.ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, HALL and SGROI, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Duffy, JJ.MATTER of Milton J. B. (Anonymous), ap, v. Denise A. P.-P. (Anonymous), res — Motion by the appellant to recall and vacate a decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 28, 2016, which, inter alia, dismissed an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 21, 2016, and reinstate the appeal, and to vacate an order of support and to direct repayment of money paid pursuant to the order of support.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to recall and vacate the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 28, 2016, and reinstate the appeal is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.DILLON, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Duffy, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Antwan Thompson, ap — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 24, 2013, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated May 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.One West Bank, res, v. Jerry Schiffman ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Lyra Bert, ap, v. New York City Transit Authority res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated May 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Hui Juan Lin, as mother and natural guardian of K.I. ap, v. New York City Board of Education def, United States of America, Inc., res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Raquel Bouton, ap, v. Charles Bouton, res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 11, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated November 27, 2017, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Pedro Pazmino, plf-res, v. Lacher/Koeppel Realty Corp., defendants third-party plf-res, Steelcraft Rolling Doors, Inc., third-party def-ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Elena Spiridonova, plf-res, v. Boris Frolov def-res, Ralph Ramos, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Karl Pupke, ap, v. Sheila J. Poole, as acting Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 19, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Mariya Belokopytaya, res, v. Aron Gerstel, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Karen OFaire Bolling, as attorney-in-fact for Luther OFaire, res, v. Elmhurst Care Center, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Thomas W. Riutta, res, v. Debra A. Ferri, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated May 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Ashley M. Merced, ap, v. Carlos A. Asang, res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Brian Jonas ap, v. Solstice Residential Group, LLC respondents def — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 22, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated November 27, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Onewest Bank, FSB, res, v. Everette Weaver, ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated April 27, 2016, on the grounds that the appellant failed to settle the transcript and the record is inadequate, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Cross motion by the appellant, inter alia, to impose a sanction upon the respondent and its counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal is denied on condition that on or before January 30, 2018, the appellant settle the transcript of the proceedings which occurred on March 1, 2016, and serve and file a supplemental record containing the corrected transcript pages or an errata sheet, or advise this Court, in writing, that no corrections to the transcript contained in the record are necessary, and serve and file a supplemental record containing the notice of motion dated September 16, 2015, and accompanying papers and exhibits filed in support of the respondent’s motion for summary judgment, the appellant’s opposition dated October 8, 2015, and annexed exhibits, and the respondent’s Exhibits 2, 3, 4, and 5 submitted at trial; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 1, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Onewest Bank, FSB, res, v. Everette Weaver, ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to strike the record on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 7, 2015, inter alia, on the ground that it is inadequate and direct the appellant to serve and file a replacement record, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Cross motion by the appellant, inter alia, to impose a sanction upon the respondent and its counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to strike the record and direct the appellant to serve and file a replacement record is granted to the extent that on or before January 2, 2018, the appellant shall serve and file a supplemental record containing Exhibits G and I to the affirmation of Lawrence Thomas dated October 13, 2015; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 1, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Onewest Bank, FSB, res, v. Everette Weaver, ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated April 8, 2016, on the grounds that the appellant failed to settle the transcript and the record is inadequate, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief. Cross motion by the appellant, inter alia, to impose a sanction upon the respondent and its counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal is denied on condition that on or before January 30, 2018, the appellant settle the transcript of the proceedings which occurred on March 1, 2016, and serve and file a supplemental record containing the corrected transcript pages or an errata sheet, or advise this Court, in writing, that no corrections to the transcript contained in the record are necessary, and serve and file a supplemental record containing the respondent’s Exhibits 2, 3, 4, and 5 submitted at trial; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 1, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Hall, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.Jorge Sarmiento plf-res, v. Russell J. Bonker ap, Tomy v. Joseph, def-res — 2017-08849, 2017-12119Jorge Sarmiento plaintiffs-respondents,v Russell J. Bonker appellants, TomyV. Joseph, defendant-respondent.(Index No. 65849/16)Motion by the appellants to consolidate appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 23, 2017, and July 11, 2017, respectively. Cross motion by the defendant-respondent to dismiss the appeal from the order dated July 11, 2017, on the ground that the right of direct appeal from that order terminated upon entry of a judgment in the above-entitled action on August 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated July 11, 2017, is deemed also to be a notice of appeal from the judgment entered August 7, 2017 (see CPLR 5501[c]); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]); and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal from the order dated July 11, 2017, for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated January 23, 2017, is enlarged until January 19, 2018.BALKIN, J.P., HALL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Robertus Coleman, ap, v. MCIZ Corp. res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from a judgment and an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 20, 2016 and June 23, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 12, 2017, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Julius Behrend, ap, v. The New Windsor Group, LLC res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 5, 2017, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Timothy M. Rooney, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 18, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kristian P. Sorbera, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 16, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged, and the respondent’s brief submitted to the Clerk of the Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.
