DECISION AND ORDERI. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Charles Burgin is the founder of Brotherman’s Progress Mentors Matter Advocacy, a group dedicated to advocating for minority male students in the Buffalo, N.Y., public school system. In 2013 and 2014, Burgin worked to have the Buffalo Board of Education adopt a mentoring program called “5000 Role Models of Excellence Project” in the Buffalo public schools. After the Board of Education ultimately declined to adopt the program, Burgin sued here pro se on behalf of himself and at-risk minority male students and their parents, alleging a number of federal and state claims. Defendants1 moved to dismiss Burgin’s amended complaint under Rules 12 (b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (standing) and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Docket No. 19.) With briefing fully completed and oral argument deemed unnecessary, this Court will grant Defendants’ motion and afford Burgin 45 days to file a second amended complaint.II. BACKGROUNDA. Procedural HistoryOn March 4, 2015, Burgin filed a 29-page handwritten complaint together with 176 pages of exhibits, which the Buffalo Board of Education promptly moved to dismiss on March 30, 2015. (Docket Nos. 1, 3.) The majority of remaining defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on August 26 and 27, 2015, after Burgin further accomplished service. (Docket Nos. 10, 12.) On December 15, 2015, Burgin responded in opposition to the pending motions and filed an amended complaint. (Docket Nos. 17, 18.)Burgin’s amended complaint is typed, but remains overly long, at 28 pages and 201 pages of exhibits. (Docket No. 18.) The amended complaint is a narrative of Burgin’s interactions with the various defendants and others concerning his efforts to convince the Buffalo Board of Education to implement the “5000 Role Models of Excellence Project” program. (Id.) Burgin includes numerous detailed factual allegations, but fails to meaningfully tie them to his stated claims. (Id.) This failure, in part, lead to Defendants moving to dismiss the amended complaint on December 28, 2015. (Docket No. 19.) Briefing on that motion concluded on January 25, 2016, after which this Court deemed the initial motions to dismiss (Docket Nos. 3, 10, 12) moot in light of the filing of the amended complaint and reserved decision on Defendants’ December 28, 2015 motion to dismiss.2 (Docket Nos. 24, 27.)B. FactsThe following facts, drawn from Burgin’s amended complaint, are assumed true for purposes of assessing Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Crupar-Weinmann v. Paris Baguette Am., Inc., 861 F.3d 76, 79 (2d Cir. 2017); ATSI Commc’ns, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd., 493 F.3d 87, 98 (2d Cir. 2007).Plaintiff Charles Burgin, an African-American male, is the founder of Brotherman’s Progress Mentors Matter Advocacy, a group dedicated to advocating for minority male students in the Buffalo public school system. (Amended Complaint, Docket No. 18,
5, 24, 73.) He is also a volunteer in the Buffalo public school system, serving as chairman of the District Parent Coordinating Council Mentor Committee and as a 2011 superintendent-appointee on the Buffalo Public School Special Mentor Committee (“the Committee”), which was specifically tasked with creating and implementing district policies to establish a comprehensive mentor program. (Id. at
