IN RE JENNIFER D., pet-res, v. ARTISE C. J., res-res

4773. IN RE JENNIFER D., pet-res, v. ARTISE C. J., res-res — Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Jericho (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), for ap — Law Office of Bruce A. Young, New York (Bruce A. Young of counsel), for res — Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2015, which, upon finding that respondent father had willfully violated a court order mandating child support payments, sentenced him to incarceration for a term of six months, and set the purge amount at $5,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

4773. IN RE JENNIFER D., pet-res, v. ARTISE C. J., res-res — Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Jericho (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), for ap — Law Office of Bruce A. Young, New York (Bruce A. Young of counsel), for res — Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2015, which, upon finding that respondent father had willfully violated a court order mandating child support payments, sentenced him to incarceration for a term of six months, and set the purge amount at $5,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The father failed to rebut prima facie evidence of his willful violation of the order of support entered on or about February 25, 2014 (see Family Ct Act §454[3][a]). The father failed to present credible evidence that his alleged medical condition rendered him unable to provide support for the parties’ children, or that he was financially unable to pay (see e.g. Matter of April G. v. Duane M., 105 AD3d 491 [1st Dept 2013]). The father also failed to provide proof that he diligently sought gainful employment during the relevant time period (see Matter of Maria T. v. Kwame A., 35 AD3d 239, 240 [1st Dept 2006]). Nor did he provide documentation in support of his uncorroborated testimony that he had only recently obtained employment as a sales representative, earning $200/week plus commission. The Support Magistrate found the father’s testimony to be not credible, and there is no basis to disturb that determination (see Matter of Everett C. v. Oneida P., 61 AD3d 489 [1st Dept 2009]). Evidence of the father’s online social media profile reflected travel and other activity that belied his claim that he was without funds to pay support (see e.g. Matter of Powers v. Horner, 12 AD3d 609, 609 [2d Dept 2004]).

IN RE JENNIFER D., pet-res, v. ARTISE C. J., res-res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal