RASHREE SINGH, res-ap, KAMLA NARSINGH res, v. CITY LIMOUSINE TRANSPORTATION, INC. APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def

RASHREE SINGH, res-ap, KAMLA NARSINGH res, v. CITY LIMOUSINE TRANSPORTATION, INC. APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def — (INDEX NO. 5916/10)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Malan appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), entered November 19, 2013, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that none of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law §5102(d), and the plaintiff Rashree Singh cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same order as, in effect, denied her cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim of the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Malan against her.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

RASHREE SINGH, res-ap, KAMLA NARSINGH res, v. CITY LIMOUSINE TRANSPORTATION, INC. APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def — (INDEX NO. 5916/10)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Malan appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), entered November 19, 2013, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that none of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law §5102(d), and the plaintiff Rashree Singh cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same order as, in effect, denied her cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim of the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Malan against her.

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, (1) by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion of the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Malan which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them by the plaintiff Majaina Ibrahim-Singh, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion, and (2) by deleting the provision thereof, in effect, denying the cross motion of the plaintiff Rashree Singh for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim of the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Malan against her, and substituting therefor a provision granting the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Mulan payable by the plaintiff Majaina Ibrahim-Singh, and one bill of costs to the plaintiffs Rashree Singh and Kamla Narsingh payable by the defendants City Limousine Transportation, Inc., and Luis Mulan.

RASHREE SINGH, res-ap, KAMLA NARSINGH res, v. CITY LIMOUSINE TRANSPORTATION, INC. APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal