JENNIFER NOONAN, ap, v. VINCENT TARDO, res

MATTER OF JENNIFER NOONAN, ap, v. VINCENT TARDO, res — (PROCEEDING NO. 3) (DOCKET NOS. V-22463-01, V-6569-07, V-31938-07)In related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an amended order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated June 22, 2011, as, after a hearing, granted the petition of the maternal grandparents, Barbara Noonan and Kenneth Noonan, in effect, for sole custody of the child James pursuant to Family Court Act §651(b), granted the separate petition of the maternal grandparents for sole custody of the child Vanessa to the extent of awarding them joint custody of Vanessa with Vanessa's father, Vincent Tardo, with physical custody and decision-making authority to Vincent Tardo, and with legal and physical custody of Vanessa to transfer immediately to the maternal grandparents should Vincent Tardo fail to submit to bi-monthly drug and alcohol blood tests, provide a copy of the test results to the maternal grandparents, and remain drugand alcohol-free, and denied her application for sole custody of Vanessa.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MATTER OF JENNIFER NOONAN, ap, v. VINCENT TARDO, res — (PROCEEDING NO. 3) (DOCKET NOS. V-22463-01, V-6569-07, V-31938-07)In related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an amended order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated June 22, 2011, as, after a hearing, granted the petition of the maternal grandparents, Barbara Noonan and Kenneth Noonan, in effect, for sole custody of the child James pursuant to Family Court Act §651(b), granted the separate petition of the maternal grandparents for sole custody of the child Vanessa to the extent of awarding them joint custody of Vanessa with Vanessa’s father, Vincent Tardo, with physical custody and decision-making authority to Vincent Tardo, and with legal and physical custody of Vanessa to transfer immediately to the maternal grandparents should Vincent Tardo fail to submit to bi-monthly drug and alcohol blood tests, provide a copy of the test results to the maternal grandparents, and remain drugand alcohol-free, and denied her application for sole custody of Vanessa.

ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the mother’s notice of appeal from an order of the same court dated May 25, 2011, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the amended order dated June 22, 2011 (see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,

JENNIFER NOONAN, ap, v. VINCENT TARDO, res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal