The clock for claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act starts running when the bank freezes a debtor’s account, not when the notice of debt is served, a federal appeals court has held.

The statute of limitations ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit revived, at least for the time being, an unfair debt collection action against a lawyer and his firm. The circuit reversed a district judge who had barred debtor Alexander Benzemann from bringing an action under the act and remanded the case for further proceedings in Benzemann v. Citibank N.A., 14-2668-cv.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]