A divided Appellate Division, Second Department, panel ruled a bank had presented an issue of fact as to whether it had properly debited a customer’s checking account for $50,000 based on a phone authorization the customer denied ever giving.

The 3-1 ruling in Proactive Dealer Services v. TD Bank, 3053/10 Wednesday held that a bank officer’s affidavit saying the customer had expressly authorized the transfer was sufficient to overcome the strict liability a bank assumes under UCC 1-201(41) when it debits an account without the authentic signature of the customer on the check.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]