Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn’t sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court.
Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm’s former lawyers.
Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn't sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court. Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm's former lawyers. The idea got a cool reception Wednesday during oral arguments in a case that saw nine major law firms and two large county bar associations filing briefs as amici curiae to oppose the concept. California appellate courts are split on the issue.
September 06, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn’t sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court.
Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm’s former lawyers.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS