After drugmaker Pfizer came out swinging against the expert witnesses the plaintiffs want to use to show a causal relationship between Zoloft and birth defects, plaintiffs lawyers said in court papers that their experts’ opinions are admissible.
Lead lawyers Mark Robinson Jr. and Kevin Calcagnie, of Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, and Dianne Nast, of NastLaw LLC, said in the court filing that Pfizer’s own internal company documents support the general causation opinions of Anick Bérard, a perinatal epidemiologist who studies babies’ exposure to drugs before they are born.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
