Class action defendants frequently oppose class certification by arguing that a class action may not be certified when damages cannot be calculated on a classwide basis, citing recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011), and Comcast v. Behrend, 133 S. Ct. 1426 (2013). Recent decisions suggest that one response to such arguments may be to seek the certification of "issues" classes under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(4).
What is an "issues" class? Lawyers typically think of class certification as encompassing an entire case. For example, a case seeking equitable or declaratory relief might be certified under Rule 23(b)(2), or a case for damages might be certified under Rule 23(b)(3). Such certifications often are understood to encompass everything: all causes of action, and all parts of the case, from proof of liability through the award of relief.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
