DOMA ARGUMENTS
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on April 4 heard arguments over the Defense of Marriage Act. Paul Clement of Bancroft, representing members of Congress, argued that “government can rationally say [marriage] is too important of an institution to make a change to.” Mary Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders argued: “For the entire history of our country, the one constant of marriage law has been change.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
