Idea-theft claims are rampant in Hollywood. Aspiring writers submit ideas to producers and studios in the hope of landing the windfall of a hit television show or motion picture. Claims often result due to “that obsessive conviction, so common among authors…, that all similarities between their works and any others which appear later must inevitably be ascribed to plagiarism.” See Litchfield v. Spielberg, 736 F.2d 1352, 1358 (9th Cir. 1984).

On May 4, in a decision closely watched by the entertainment industry, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television Inc., 2011 U.S. App. Lexis 9099, at *4 (9th Cir. May 4, 2011), issued an en banc decision holding that breach-of-implied-contract claims arising from purported idea theft are not pre-empted under § 301 of the U.S. Copyright Act.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]