The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that class actions are essential to ensuring justice, especially when corporations take small amounts of money from large numbers of people. If a company, for example, cheats 17 million people out of $30 each, a class action is the only way to protect consumers and hold it accountable. Judges across the ideological spectrum understand this. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote this June in Rent-A-Center v. Jackson , quoting Judge Richard Posner, “The realistic alternative to a class action is not 17 million individual suits, but zero individual suits, as only a lunatic or a fanatic sues for $30.”
Now, in precisely such a case — a class action charging AT&T with cheating Vincent and Liza Concepcion out of $30.22 (and thousands of similar sums for cell phones it said would be free) — the phone company is asking the Supreme Court to let it wipe out class actions. The company is dialing a wrong number.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
