The next time you’re mowing the lawn, or stuck in traffic on your morning commute, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wants you to throw on a U.S. Supreme Court argument. 

If you do, she suggested, you might get an appreciation for the court not as a political entity, but as a collegial judicial body focused on the law—that was at least the takeaway Barrett’s sister had after listening to Trump v. Anderson this month, which concerns former President Donald Trump’s eligibility for office.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]