Lawrence VanDyke testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, on October 30, 2019. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Judge Lawrence VanDyke once again railed against the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for its immigration precedent, which he has described as “judge-jitsu” and too sympathetic toward asylum seekers and individuals facing deportation.
In a dissent Monday, the Trump appointee said his colleagues in the majority, Judge Andrew Hurwitz and visiting U.S. District Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz of the Southern District of California, wrongly sided with Mexican immigrant Fernando Cordero-Garcia in his bid to remain in the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
