A federal appeals court on Friday denied a request to rehear a case over whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau needed to redo an investigation into a California law firm, after a U.S. Supreme Court decision found the agency’s leadership was unconstitutionally structured, and called into question pending probes.

On Friday, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request by one of the judges on the court to rehear en banc arguments in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]