Kimberly Moore, left, and Timothy Dyk, right.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is sticking with its Arthrex decision on the appointment on administrative patent judges.
Over the dissents of four judges, the appellate court declined to make any changes to Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew. The decision leaves administrative patent judges with less job protection, and makes up to 81 cases eligible for new hearings.
March 23, 2020 at 07:15 PM
1 minute read
Kimberly Moore, left, and Timothy Dyk, right.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is sticking with its Arthrex decision on the appointment on administrative patent judges.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS