Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
The unprecedented nature of the charges against our client … really threatened fundamental principles of democracy.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
At Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, we believe that our lawyers have a duty to contribute to society through pro bono work, including in the courts and through leadership in institutions that promote the rule of law and human rights. We strongly encourage pro bono work by all of our attorneys. Last year, we devoted over 145,000 pro bono hours worldwide to causes like immigration advocacy, protecting civil liberties and nonprofit corporate governance.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, you represented Aaron Cantu, a young journalist who was arrested while covering the demonstrations at the 2017 Presidential Inauguration. Tell us more about the case and how you reached the outcome.
Our client was a freelance journalist who had a long history of providing front-line coverage of significant historical events, including demonstrations and protests of important political and social issues. Despite his attendance at the demonstration in his capacity as a reporter, he was arrested and charged with felony riot. We viewed his arrest and prosecution as a double affront to the First Amendment because it not only threatened journalism, but specifically journalism covering political dissent that is itself protected by the First Amendment. We moved to dismiss the charges against him on First Amendment grounds and while our motion was pending, the government voluntarily dismissed all charges against him. It was a victory for him and freedom of the press.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
The unprecedented nature of the charges against our client—which were also filed against hundreds of others who protested the Inauguration—really threatened fundamental principles of democracy. It was incredibly empowering to see that risk and to be able to step into the ring on the right side of history. It was gratifying to contribute to a legal battle that truly touched on who we are as Americans.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
Our pro bono matters are incredibly diverse, and reflect Gibson Dunn's commitment to principles of justice. In 2018, we continued to fight on behalf of immigrants across the United States. For example, our lawyers were able to obtain a nationwide preliminary injunction that stopped interference with DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), and responded immediately to help reunite immigrant families who were separated at the U.S.-Mexico border or affected by the travel ban.
We have also helped achieve justice for domestic violence survivors, regularly helping clients obtain protection orders against abusers, and we led the successful efforts in England and Wales to criminalize upskirting, the intolerable practice of taking photographs up women's skirts without their consent.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
I believe it is important to lead by example, including through pro bono work. By volunteering on these matters—which include some of the leading social and legal issues of our day—we help raise the bar, and hopefully increase the number of talented attorneys throughout the industry who become engaged on civic, social and political issues that affect all of us. I'm proud to contribute to that public service.
Responses submitted by Chantale Fiebig, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher whose practice focuses on complex civil litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
'Lack of Independence' or 'Tethered to the Law'? Witnesses Speak on Bondi
4 minute readFormer Thomas Clerk Sarah Harris to Serve as Acting Solicitor General
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250