When preparing for her first U.S. Supreme Court argument in United States v. Windsor, Roberta Kaplan faced “something like seven moot courts,” she recalled last week. “It was like a root canal without anesthesia.”
Two of the four lawyers who will make their high court debuts this month in the same-sex marriage challenges no doubt are discovering what Kaplan, an experienced appellate litigator at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, learned in 2013: A Supreme Court argument is in a category by itself.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
