In a ruling issued on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan rejected arguments by Apple Inc. that an upcoming damages trial in the e-books price-fixing litigation shouldn’t be held in her courtroom. Judging from Cote’s latest decision, tempers haven’t cooled since she ruled in July 2013 that Apple is liable for violations of antitrust laws.
“Apple’s motion is made for tactical purposes of delay,” Cote wrote. “By its statements and conduct throughout this litigation, Apple has repeatedly manifested its consent to a single trial on damages and to that trial occurring in this venue.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
