Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff has come out guns-a-blazing in an appellate brief filed on his behalf with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The brief, submitted Monday by court-appointed counsel John “Rusty” Wing of Lankler Siffert & Wohl in support of Rakoff’s position, accuses Citigroup Global Markets and the Securities and Exchange Commission of twisting the Manhattan judge’s words and mischaracterizing his decision to scuttle the SEC’s $285 million settlement with Citi for allegedly misleading investors in a $1 billion collateralized debt obligation. You can read the hefty 90-page brief here; the court allowed the outsized filing given the voluminous briefs filed by the SEC, Citi, and various amici. From the start, Wing asserts that—contrary to what the SEC and Citi have contended—Rakoff didn’t refuse to approve the settlement because Citi wouldn’t admit to any wrongdoing. Instead, he argues, Rakoff simply needed more information to determine if the settlement was fair, reasonable, and in the public interest. Rakoff’s position will be tested at oral arguments in September. In the meantime, here are some highlights from the brief:

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2017 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.